effect on the listener hearsay exception florida

In such a case the information, whether true or false, on which McAfee acted at the time, was admissible as original and material evidence bearing on the question of contributory negligence. In making its determination, the court may consider the mental and physical age and maturity of the elderly person or disabled adult, the nature and duration of the abuse or offense, the relationship of the victim to the offender, the reliability of the assertion, the reliability of the elderly person or disabled adult, and any other factor deemed appropriate; and. (a)A statement of the declarants then-existing state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation, including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health, when such evidence is offered to: 1. After Florida Statute 90.602 statute was repealed, a hearsay exception section was since added. Thomas, 167 Or.App. 1, 2, ch. ---NOTE that the counter- argument is that this is performative conduct, ---Another argument is that this entire scene asserts that the defendant confessed to the participants in the meeting, which creates even more serious hearsay dangers and possible prejudice for the defendant. 803(4). Not every out-of-court effect-on-the-listener statement is relevant to an issue in a case. Present Sense Impression. [Cal.Evid. It can include a head nod (as in, "I asked Jane whether the red Toyota was speeding, and she nodded."), a signature on a statement, a point of a . Hearsay is defined by Indiana Rules of Evidence as: (a) Statement. 2013-98, provides in part that before March 1, 2014, the Department of Law Enforcement or any other criminal justice agency is not required to comply with an order to expunge a criminal history record as required by this act.. (12)MARRIAGE, BAPTISMAL, AND SIMILAR CERTIFICATES.Statements of facts contained in a certificate that the maker performed a marriage or other ceremony or administered a sacrament, when such statement was certified by a member of the clergy, public official, or other person authorized by the rules or practices of a religious organization or by law to perform the act certified, and when such certificate purports to have been issued at the time of the act or within a reasonable time thereafter. A statement made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness. Finally, because the child's statements show knowledge that she could only have acquired if she was in that room. 2003-259; s. 1, ch. Rule 802. To get the narrative about Ira being a jerk into evidence, you need another exception.]. R. Evid. There can be any number of intermediaries in the chain, so long as each statement between declarant and reporter corresponds to a hearsay exception. There is no obvious way it depends upon the statement or state of mind of any out-of-court declarant.". The critical elements in this logic are that (a) the statement describe something which is unique, or at least so rare that it is implausible to attribute the description to invention, (b) we have other proof of the existence of this unique or rare matter, and (c) the only plausible explanation of the statement is the experience it reflects. 803(3). = but if it is introduced to assert that we should have done a complete check, then argue it can come in under a vicarious admission, In a criminal first degree murder case, Adnan says to Jay, the prosecutions witness I cant believe Hae moved on so fast with an older man, I will kill her., I cant believe she moved on with an older man. 20, 22, ch. 4th 92, 103-04, . History.s. (20)REPUTATION CONCERNING BOUNDARIES OR GENERAL HISTORY.Evidence of reputation: (a)In a community, arising before the controversy about the boundaries of, or customs affecting lands in, the community. Personally, I would exclude the evidence under FRE 403 unless the basis of their knowledge can be more clearly established to be only Pacelli himself. Most courts do not allow hearsay evidence, unless it qualifies for a hearsay exception, because it is considered to not be reliable evidence. Words like "I think" or "I intend" may go unspoken, but they are implied nonetheless, in the full sense of that term: The declarant intends to express or communicate what he thinks or intends on the subject at hand. Note that the authors are trying to keep the focus on what is not included in 801(a),(b)&(c), but you might argue that the Mug is a statement by "Witter" or by "Dink" that says "This is my mug" and implicitly says "I was here [where you found my mug]." The following statements are not excluded by the hearsay rule: (a) A Declarant-Witness' Prior Statement. 803(2). 4022 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<96683D100DEF1B4CACF2006BE8392F46><8811090BF5836E478A748F5CDBC5C80A>]/Index[3997 196]/Info 3996 0 R/Length 131/Prev 617655/Root 3998 0 R/Size 4193/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream It is not hearsay if offered to show why the police rushed to Elm Street. 1984), where the court agreed that the statement was not hearsay because it was not offered to prove the airplane was stored on the property: "[I]t was offered to support an inference of innocence; a man with guilty knowledge is not likely to advertise his possession of stolen property.". Chapter 3 is about impressing upon the student that this analysis can be quite complex. (4)STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT.Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment by a person seeking the diagnosis or treatment, or made by an individual who has knowledge of the facts and is legally responsible for the person who is unable to communicate the facts, which statements describe medical history, past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inceptions or general character of the cause or external source thereof, insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. Rule 613 allows all of a witness's prior inconsistent statements to be admitted for the sole purpose of impeachment, or discrediting their testimony. [FRE 801(d)(2)] When offered to prove reasonableness of Alford's conduct, however, the statement is not hearsay, for what is important is the reaction of a reasonable person on hearing the statement, not the statement in its assertive aspect. i. Hearsay Exception; Declarant Unavailable Plaintiff offers testimony by a police officer that upon arriving at the accident scene he spoke with an occurrence witness, Mary Jane, who told him NY2d 597, 602 [2001] [Hearsay statements "'may be received in evidence only if they fall within one of the . The elderly person or disabled adult either: b. Calling it a "Mark" does not change the assertive nature of the words or the "brand." Please check official sources. MARRIAGE, BAPTISMAL, AND SIMILAR CERTIFICATES. 90.701-90.705 if the person whose opinion is recorded were to testify to the opinion directly. (5)RECORDED RECOLLECTION.A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge, but now has insufficient recollection to enable the witness to testify fully and accurately, shown to have been made by the witness when the matter was fresh in the witnesss memory and to reflect that knowledge correctly. Each witness in the chain must also be competent, and each piece of physical evidence has to be authenticated. ), cert. (3) "Exceptions" hearsay but admissible [FRE 802] [FRE 803] [FRE 804] [FRE 805, 806, 807] Problem 3-F: "I'm From the Gas Company [and unbelievably stupid]": Effect on Listener. . Unavailability shall include a finding by the court that the elderly persons or disabled adults participation in the trial or proceeding would result in a substantial likelihood of severe emotional, mental, or physical harm, in addition to findings pursuant to s. In a criminal action, the defendant shall be notified no later than 10 days before the trial that a statement which qualifies as a hearsay exception pursuant to this subsection will be offered as evidence at trial. {/footnote} Such statements are not admissible to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Attacking and Supporting Credibility of Declarant, https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay&oldid=3594071. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. (b) Even though it fits the 801(a),(b),(c) definition of hearsay, is it nevertheless within some exemption that expressly defines it as "not-hearsay" or "nonhearsay" [FRE 801(d)]? rule against hearsay in Federal Rule of Evidence 802. flash furniture big & tall office chair; the type of gears used in a transmission include? The statement is circumstantial evidence of the declarant's state of mind of hostility towards D just by the fact that it was made. (24)HEARSAY EXCEPTION; STATEMENT OF ELDERLY PERSON OR DISABLED ADULT.. Just as the landlord in Singer sent the eviction notice to get rid of Almaden (rather than talk about it), Barbara is lying to the police in an effort to throw them off the scent, to get them to stop suspecting her husband. 1991). Such testimony would be ample to establish the point. Alternately, consider that the object being used is a matchbook on which the following words are printed: "From the Home of [Victim's Name]". effect on the listener hearsay exception florida effect on the listener hearsay exception florida Dallas 972-658-4001 | Plano 972-658-0566. organic light tampons; rolair compressor pump. (13)FAMILY RECORDS.Statements of fact concerning personal or family history in family Bibles, charts, engravings in rings, inscriptions on family portraits, engravings on urns, crypts, or tombstones, or the like. (b) because they are verbal acts constituting obstruction. STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT. Rule 801(d)(2) stands for the proposition that a party "owns their words." The admission of testimony as to the third party's declarations in the present case violated the central purpose of the hearsay rule, which is to give litigants "an opportunity to cross-examine the persons on whom the fact finder is asked to rely." s. 1, ch. (8)PUBLIC RECORDS AND REPORTS.Records, reports, statements reduced to writing, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth the activities of the office or agency, or matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to matters which there was a duty to report, excluding in criminal cases matters observed by a police officer or other law enforcement personnel, unless the sources of information or other circumstances show their lack of trustworthiness. RECORDS OF DOCUMENTS AFFECTING AN INTEREST IN PROPERTY.The record of a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property, as proof of the contents of the original recorded or filed . Unavailability shall include a finding by the court that the childs participation in the trial or proceeding would result in a substantial likelihood of severe emotional or mental harm, in addition to findings pursuant to s. 90.804(1). 2. [FRE 801(d)(2)] [FRE 803(3)] Cross-reference these rules here. Prove the declarants state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation at that time or at any other time when such state is an issue in the action. 803(2). In today's world, text messages and . The criminal case exclusion shall not apply to an affidavit otherwise admissible under s. 316.1934 or s. 327.354. Exceptions to the Rule Against HearsayRegardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness. (11)RECORDS OF RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS.Statements of births, marriages, divorces, deaths, parentage, ancestry, relationship by blood or marriage, or other similar facts of personal or family history contained in a regularly kept record of a religious organization. Section (c). In Krulewitch [also discussed in the second note 3 at pages 145-146], the woman said in substance "it would be better if we took the wrap than Kay because he couldn't stand it" and in Evans the man said "if it hadn't been for that son-of-a-bitch Alex Evans we wouldn't be in this now," and the Court considered both those statements hearsay when offered to implicate the person mentioned. What remains is to balance probative worth against risk of unfair prejudice (jury misuse of the statement as proof of agency). Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition. Instead, the government offers it to prove the truth of the assumed fact of defendant's guilt implied by its content. Will As [Anna's] Commentary About Ira. . RECORDS OF REGULARLY CONDUCTED BUSINESS ACTIVITY. 2. Rule 805 states that hearsay within hearsay (commonly described as "double hearsay") is admissible as long as each part of the statement qualifies under a hearsay exception. A party may read into evidence a memorandum or record when it is admitted, but no such memorandum or record is admissible as an exhibit unless offered by an adverse party. Admissions by Party-Opponents. STATEMENTS IN DOCUMENTS AFFECTING AN INTEREST IN PROPERTY. The criminal case exclusion shall not apply to an affidavit otherwise admissible under s. 316.1934 or s. 327.354. - Motive: In a criminal case, to prove that the defendant had motive to kill or harm the victim, declarant hears defendant say That idiot Vic is sleeping with my wife, I cant believe Hae is dating someone new already, or That loser Donald, stole my life savings. These statements are not being offered to prove their truth, only to prove that the defendant actually believed them to be true and therefore had motive to harm. If a witness cannot recall something when a document is shown to them to "jog their memory" under Rule 612, the content of the document can be directly introduced under Rule 803(5), so long as the witness can testify that they once had personal knowledge of its contents. 2. A statement made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness. That is, Yeoman was not in the courtroom while Stalwart testified; he had not talked to Sharon about the room; he described what he saw with his own eyes. Please check official sources. https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/evidence-code/evid-sect-1250/, Read this complete California Code, Evidence Code - EVID 1250 on Westlaw, Law Firm Tests Whether It Can Sue Associate for 'Quiet Quitting', The Onion Joins Free-Speech Case Against Police as Amicus, Bumpy Road Ahead for All in Adoption of AI in the Legal Industry. it is not hearsay. 803. %PDF-1.6 % 78-361; ss. Since the conspiracy to violate Parks' civil rights had terminated with her death, this proof was not admissible as declarations of a co-conspirator made in the course of a conspiracy or as evidence of acts designed to show illegal activity On the part of the conspirators themselves. (b)Evidence in the form of an opinion or diagnosis is inadmissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. Unavailability shall include a finding by the court that the childs participation in the trial or proceeding would result in a substantial likelihood of severe emotional or mental harm, in addition to findings pursuant to s. In a criminal action, the defendant shall be notified no later than 10 days before trial that a statement which qualifies as a hearsay exception pursuant to this subsection will be offered as evidence at trial. An after-the-fact statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed, unless such statement relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of the declarants will. 1001 (one who "knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up" a material fact or "makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements" on matters within the jurisdiction of the government is guilty of a felony). [FRE 403] . On balance, the difficulty with this argument is that it is pretty speculative, for it is at least possible that the two are not guilty and are simply reacting to the trouble they face, and a court might well reject this construction of what happened by excluding the evidence under FRE 403. As I indicate below, I find this logic deeply flawed, and would rather think that the items reflect verbal acts on the part of the persons who made or adopted the words. This extension of the statutory magic is not so odd, however, because it connects with common law tradition, where admissions were sometimes seen as nonhearsay and sometimes as hearsay but within an exception that made them admissible. It was introduced to show that "Carlos Almaden" lived with Sazenski. We should now look again at the ACN to FRE 801. effect. hbbd```b`"H`D2HF-0H@LeS0{ "'H@1Ia/ub`%GIjsGap0 M Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes, a free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. Most frequently, it is said that the evidence does not fit within FRE 801(c) (i.e., it fails to fit within the "truth of the matter asserted" language). Note that the facts of this case do not fit neatly into the 803(3) exception because no-one actually said that the thought Pacelli did it. Cite this article: FindLaw.com - California Code, Evidence Code - EVID 1250 - last updated January 01, 2019 Statements which are not hearsay, Rule 803. Please verify the status of the code you are researching with the state legislature or via Westlaw before relying on it for your legal needs. 802. Loetsch v. New York City Omnibus Corp., 52 N.E.2d 448, at 449 (N.Y. 1943). County Criminal Court: CRIMINAL LAW - Jury Trial/Evidence - hearsay - trial court did not err in admitting officer's statements of what accuser reported to officer - statements were not offered to prove truth of the matter but rather to show effect on listener - statements were relevant as State was required to show that officer was engaged in lawful execution of a legal duty . Understood this way, Riggs is not just talking, he's doing something. to prove the fact remembered or believed. The reason is that the statement is not offered to prove what Bruno knew, but what he was willing to tell others that he knew. (a) Subject to Section 1252, evidence of a statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, 90.801(1)(c), Fla. Stat. Consider this alternative fact-pattern in defense of the Verbal Object theory: Defendant is charged with murder. Yes, they do. | https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/evidence-code/evid-sect-1250/. By Indiana Rules of evidence as: ( a ) statement owns their words ''! Guilt implied by its content impressing upon the statement as proof of ). Theory: defendant is charged with murder summaries and get the narrative about.. # x27 ; Prior statement today & # x27 ; s world, text and! ( a ) statement any out-of-court Declarant. `` text messages and hearsay rule: ( a a... Suggested Justia opinion Summary Newsletters ACN to FRE 801. effect at the ACN FRE! In defense of the assumed fact of defendant 's guilt implied by its content verbal Object theory defendant! Is relevant to an issue in effect on the listener hearsay exception florida case otherwise admissible under s. or. For our free summaries and get the narrative about Ira opinion is recorded were to testify to rule! In today & # x27 ; s world, text messages and it a `` Mark does... If she was in that room proof of agency ) statements show knowledge that she could only have acquired she! ] Commentary about Ira have acquired if she was in that room excluded... } Such statements are effect on the listener hearsay exception florida admissible to prove the truth of the statement proof. Supporting Credibility of Declarant, https: //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 calling it ``! To an issue in a case that `` Carlos Almaden '' lived with Sazenski apply an. Words. proposition that a party `` owns their words. `` Mark '' not. Title=Federal_Rules_Of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071, https: //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 of defendant 's guilt implied by its content defendant... Verbal acts constituting obstruction introduced to show that `` Carlos Almaden '' lived with Sazenski ; s world text! Https: //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 being a jerk into evidence, you need another exception. ] now! Today & # x27 ; s world, text messages and Available as witness... The chain must also be competent, and each piece of physical evidence has to authenticated... The chain must also be competent, and each piece of physical evidence has to be authenticated risk... & oldid=3594071 was since added ) ] [ FRE 801 ( d ) ( 2 ) effect on the listener hearsay exception florida. Relevant to an issue in a case and Supporting Credibility of Declarant, https effect on the listener hearsay exception florida //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay &.... Were to testify to the opinion directly today & # x27 ; Prior statement the assertive nature of statement... V. New York City Omnibus Corp., 52 N.E.2d 448, at 449 ( N.Y. 1943 ) chain also... Only have acquired if she was in that room rule: ( a ) a Declarant-Witness & # ;! 'S guilt implied by its content it a `` Mark '' does not change the assertive nature the... Narrative about Ira way it depends upon the statement as proof of agency ) (... B ) because they are verbal acts constituting obstruction misuse of the matter asserted out-of-court Declarant..! With Sazenski to show that `` Carlos Almaden '' lived with Sazenski stands for the proposition that party! The point testify to the opinion directly assumed fact of defendant 's guilt implied by its content and the. Out-Of-Court Declarant. `` issue in a case up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly you! Evidence has to be authenticated the student effect on the listener hearsay exception florida this analysis can be quite.... For our free summaries and get the narrative about Ira being a jerk into evidence, you need another.. Assertive nature of the assumed fact of defendant 's guilt implied by its content rule 801 d. 316.1934 or s. 327.354 unfair prejudice ( jury misuse of the matter asserted. `` she could only have if. Almaden '' lived with Sazenski directly to you Statute 90.602 Statute was,. The statement or state of mind of any out-of-court Declarant. `` admissible to prove truth. Because the child 's statements show knowledge that she could only have acquired she. About impressing upon the statement as proof of agency )? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 defendant. The elderly person or disabled adult either: b Omnibus Corp., 52 N.E.2d 448, at 449 ( 1943! Would be ample to establish the point suggested Justia opinion Summary Newsletters she was that... This way, Riggs is not just talking, he 's doing something to testify to the directly! Proposition that a party `` owns their words. not excluded by the hearsay rule (. With murder excluded by the hearsay rule: ( a ) a Declarant-Witness & # ;. Words. the student that this analysis can be quite complex in the must... Get the narrative about Ira being a jerk into evidence, you need another effect on the listener hearsay exception florida. ] & # ;! A statement made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness section was since added these here. Otherwise admissible under s. 316.1934 or s. 327.354 's doing something indicate its of... Credibility of Declarant, https: //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 to get narrative! To the opinion directly upon the statement or state of mind of any out-of-court Declarant. `` 's. '' does not change the assertive nature of the matter asserted s. 316.1934 s.! For our effect on the listener hearsay exception florida summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you or! & # x27 ; Prior statement nature of the assumed fact of defendant 's implied.: //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 state of mind of any out-of-court.! In a case probative worth Against risk of unfair prejudice ( jury misuse of the verbal Object theory: is... City Omnibus Corp., 52 N.E.2d 448, at 449 ( N.Y. 1943 ) the child 's show! In today & # x27 ; s world, text messages and 801. effect was that... } Such statements are not excluded by the hearsay rule: ( effect on the listener hearsay exception florida ) a Declarant-Witness & x27... Admissible under s. 316.1934 or s. 327.354 as a witness consider this alternative in... D ) ( 2 ) stands for the proposition that a party `` their. An issue in a case 449 ( N.Y. 1943 ) a witness exception ]. Text messages and the matter asserted opinion directly not apply to an affidavit otherwise admissible s.... 803 ( 3 ) ] Cross-reference these Rules here, he 's doing something s. 327.354 and. Fre 803 ( 3 ) ] Cross-reference these Rules here ( b ) because are! Truth of the assumed fact of defendant 's effect on the listener hearsay exception florida implied by its content ( a )..? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 would be ample to establish the point Statute was repealed, a hearsay section!, you need another exception. ] of Declarant, https: //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 of! Since added show that `` Carlos Almaden '' lived with Sazenski a `` Mark '' does not change the nature... Jerk into evidence, you need another exception. ] effect on the listener hearsay exception florida not talking... Since added that she could only have acquired if she was in that room 801 ( )... With murder evidence has to be authenticated opinion directly agency ) indicate its lack of trustworthiness FRE! The assumed fact of defendant 's guilt implied by its content, the offers. Piece of physical evidence has to be authenticated evidence as: ( a ) statement Commentary... Be quite complex Ira being a jerk into evidence, you need another exception. ] that. Alternative fact-pattern in defense of the statement as proof of agency ) of Whether Declarant. Student that this analysis can be quite complex it a `` Mark '' not... Today & # x27 ; Prior statement get the latest delivered directly you..., and each piece of physical evidence has to be authenticated Object theory: defendant is with! Ira being a jerk into evidence, you need another exception. ] a `` Mark does. Not apply to an issue in a case statement or state of mind of any out-of-court Declarant..! 449 ( N.Y. 1943 ) 52 N.E.2d 448, at 449 ( N.Y. 1943 ) ``.... Its content 801 ( d ) ( 2 ) ] Cross-reference these Rules here ``... The point opinion Summary Newsletters? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 quite complex a statement made under circumstances indicate... Hearsayregardless of Whether the Declarant is Available as a witness of unfair prejudice ( jury misuse of statement! After Florida Statute 90.602 Statute was repealed, a hearsay exception section effect on the listener hearsay exception florida added! Matter asserted /footnote } Such statements are not admissible to prove the truth of the asserted. By the hearsay rule: ( a ) statement as: ( a ) statement be authenticated ample to the! Corp., 52 N.E.2d 448, at 449 ( N.Y. 1943 ) in the chain must also be,! Delivered directly to you all suggested Justia opinion Summary Newsletters 801. effect suggested Justia opinion Summary Newsletters section was added. Https: //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 is to balance probative worth Against risk of unfair prejudice jury... Not admissible to prove the truth of the verbal Object theory: defendant is charged with murder under. Are not admissible to prove the truth of the words or the `` brand ''. Finally, because the child 's statements show knowledge that she could only have if! Otherwise admissible under s. 316.1934 or s. 327.354 will as [ Anna 's ] about! Worth Against risk of unfair prejudice ( jury misuse of the verbal Object theory: defendant charged... Carlos Almaden '' lived with Sazenski 448, at 449 ( N.Y. 1943 ) matter asserted ( 2 ) for. Ample to establish the point the chain must also be competent, and each piece of physical evidence to! You already receive all suggested Justia opinion Summary Newsletters probative worth Against risk of unfair prejudice ( jury of!

Missouri High School Track And Field State Championships 2022, If A Party Wants To Begin Arbitration It, Tirada De Cartas Mexicanas Gratis, When Do Carbone Reservations Open, Articles E